1.Personal Opinion of Leadership Perspectives & Style / Reflection
Good Leaders have to went through the process of born and made , without one of it , there is no way to success except for some people their are born to be a good leaders. We did not really know the significant of born and made cause we don't know what would be occur in the future , we are not the God prediction is useless for us.
Personal Opinion
How my chosen leader present its leadership?
Above the article summary have demonstrated that Angela Merkel have shows it democratic leadership in the way she overcoming or handle out her responsibility on her own organization. As merkel constitute of CDU knows as Christian Democratic Union in Germany, in any case merkel as well the leader of CDU. Angela Merkel offering her country as democratic way frequently for presenting. Merkel had won the great respect within the Germans as her way of ascendancy in a democratic organization way.
Democratic leadership have helps Angela Merkel to contend the dominance of Germany Fiance in the role of Europe. And also Merkel are the way to forming of the strong influences women in our world today. Democratic leadership is the only way for people to comply with your organizational style and action.
What my perspective on Leadership?
Basically what I have learned from leadership can recognizable to a overall long essay, I just briefly summary about what my personal perception and opinion regarding to Leadership. Leadership , to present a good leadership on taking responsibility on things , democratic leadership is suggested no matter in which organization your are fit in.
In the way of democratic leaders always treated good from low subordinates or people and no grievance incidents among leaders and subordinate. Usually this promote the good relationship among peoples and also to empathize what other people thinking. Of cause , people under your organization in absolutely satisfy on whatever decision or ideas your do.
Advantages of Democratic Leadership in Companies organization
Yet, the significance of democratic leadership reflected the loyalty , collaboration and motivational of subordinates in order persuade the high rate productivity and working organization in every department of companies to induce the well behave and good performance of subordinates with no grievance or unsatisfied.
Most delegation ahead on democratic leaders , yet more ideas will presented during brainstorming , leaders have the opportunities to choose the appropriate and wide range ideas from subordinates instead just personal opinion.
Democratic leader in Government institution organization / department
A democratic leader in politician aspect worthy as Angela Merkel , she is the good example. she usually won respect and satisfy from lower organization cabinet or people , this to eschewed the following factors happen
1. Arouse the internal disorder of the country , people dissatisfy of government institution , economy / finance recession , corrupt government and other factors to stir up the conflicts in the country
2.Reformation of new government
Angela Merkel usually had a efficiency on taking decision or responsibility , she treat every things as important. Therefore democratic leaders usually a good suggestion for every organization
Advantages of democratic leader style in Government department
1. Finance/Economic rise up / increases
2. Trade industry Development maintenance a good condition
3.High income status
4.Outflow of local talents
5.Beneficial in education department , fiance , economic , business , social , environment , medical , cooperative and other government departments.
So , I have presented my personal opinion in relation to Leadership in the business perspectives. My final conclusion was Democratic is the best chosen way of leadership style in order to forge ahead of successful.
Explanation of Autocratic and other leadership style in both Government and Companies Organization.
Companies Organization
Authoritarian Leader often don't get respect of satisfy of people or subordinate , authoritarian leaders are consider selfish , overload of aggressive dominance style led people to dislike or grievance on its actions or behavior. They don't usually share ideas , they uses money for enforcing the subordinates to worked for them.
Consequences offered the authoritarian leaders in companies organization
1. Productivity Decreases
2. Organization / Outstanding Achievement drop
3. Non staff or Low staff condition
4. Bad perception from subordinates or staff
Other leadership style describe as laissez faire leadership is offence known as irresponsibility leader . They don't care instead they just expected to earn money from the business , and Paternalistic leadership is likely differences from the authoritarian leaders , just it is softer from Authoritarian leaders.
Usually , I personally believe that Paternalistic leadership have little link with the Democratic leadership style , these type of leader generally awarded the employee with good performances ONLY. Therefore , there was a possibility to the conflict among the employees. Democratic Offered the goods to the overall employee , its is merely fair for everyone.
Authoritarian leaders in Government Institution departments
A good example for a dictator was HITLER an extreme authoritarian leader in history , he don't usually get a good moment that he just committed suicide for his behavior or mental health issues.
Yet , he offence take decision himself.He don't expected anyone to bother his business , Even though no one dare to stake a claim from him. He don't get even a single respect from the world , Hatred only against him till now day.
How my chosen leader present its leadership?
Above the article summary have demonstrated that Angela Merkel have shows it democratic leadership in the way she overcoming or handle out her responsibility on her own organization. As merkel constitute of CDU knows as Christian Democratic Union in Germany, in any case merkel as well the leader of CDU. Angela Merkel offering her country as democratic way frequently for presenting. Merkel had won the great respect within the Germans as her way of ascendancy in a democratic organization way.
Democratic leadership have helps Angela Merkel to contend the dominance of Germany Fiance in the role of Europe. And also Merkel are the way to forming of the strong influences women in our world today. Democratic leadership is the only way for people to comply with your organizational style and action.
What my perspective on Leadership?
Basically what I have learned from leadership can recognizable to a overall long essay, I just briefly summary about what my personal perception and opinion regarding to Leadership. Leadership , to present a good leadership on taking responsibility on things , democratic leadership is suggested no matter in which organization your are fit in.
In the way of democratic leaders always treated good from low subordinates or people and no grievance incidents among leaders and subordinate. Usually this promote the good relationship among peoples and also to empathize what other people thinking. Of cause , people under your organization in absolutely satisfy on whatever decision or ideas your do.
Advantages of Democratic Leadership in Companies organization
Yet, the significance of democratic leadership reflected the loyalty , collaboration and motivational of subordinates in order persuade the high rate productivity and working organization in every department of companies to induce the well behave and good performance of subordinates with no grievance or unsatisfied.
Most delegation ahead on democratic leaders , yet more ideas will presented during brainstorming , leaders have the opportunities to choose the appropriate and wide range ideas from subordinates instead just personal opinion.
Democratic leader in Government institution organization / department
A democratic leader in politician aspect worthy as Angela Merkel , she is the good example. she usually won respect and satisfy from lower organization cabinet or people , this to eschewed the following factors happen
1. Arouse the internal disorder of the country , people dissatisfy of government institution , economy / finance recession , corrupt government and other factors to stir up the conflicts in the country
2.Reformation of new government
Angela Merkel usually had a efficiency on taking decision or responsibility , she treat every things as important. Therefore democratic leaders usually a good suggestion for every organization
Advantages of democratic leader style in Government department
1. Finance/Economic rise up / increases
2. Trade industry Development maintenance a good condition
3.High income status
4.Outflow of local talents
5.Beneficial in education department , fiance , economic , business , social , environment , medical , cooperative and other government departments.
So , I have presented my personal opinion in relation to Leadership in the business perspectives. My final conclusion was Democratic is the best chosen way of leadership style in order to forge ahead of successful.
Explanation of Autocratic and other leadership style in both Government and Companies Organization.
Companies Organization
Authoritarian Leader often don't get respect of satisfy of people or subordinate , authoritarian leaders are consider selfish , overload of aggressive dominance style led people to dislike or grievance on its actions or behavior. They don't usually share ideas , they uses money for enforcing the subordinates to worked for them.
Consequences offered the authoritarian leaders in companies organization
1. Productivity Decreases
2. Organization / Outstanding Achievement drop
3. Non staff or Low staff condition
4. Bad perception from subordinates or staff
Other leadership style describe as laissez faire leadership is offence known as irresponsibility leader . They don't care instead they just expected to earn money from the business , and Paternalistic leadership is likely differences from the authoritarian leaders , just it is softer from Authoritarian leaders.
Usually , I personally believe that Paternalistic leadership have little link with the Democratic leadership style , these type of leader generally awarded the employee with good performances ONLY. Therefore , there was a possibility to the conflict among the employees. Democratic Offered the goods to the overall employee , its is merely fair for everyone.
Authoritarian leaders in Government Institution departments
A good example for a dictator was HITLER an extreme authoritarian leader in history , he don't usually get a good moment that he just committed suicide for his behavior or mental health issues.
Yet , he offence take decision himself.He don't expected anyone to bother his business , Even though no one dare to stake a claim from him. He don't get even a single respect from the world , Hatred only against him till now day.
Leader born or made?
Yet , this conversation was pretty popular now days , people wonder how other people work so well were they born or made to be worked ?
My opinion was a good leaders always born to be made , they are preordained to be born and made from others lead to their personality , attitudes so leader are consider born also. But instead of born in a good aspect , made should be the other progress for them in order to pushes them for success. Made is basically a people motivation and depend on whether people giving their opportunities to be made of success.
Sometimes , a person who born in the bad environment situation , but they still could be success and become a world wide leader. How they do it? just depend on how the good leaders treat success as significance values. So , made is the most important progress for successful. The person i state was Abraham Lincoln. For more information of Lincoln early life pleases click the links = http://www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/people/lincoln-abraham-early-life.html -( see how he success in his life time from a son of poor family to a President of United States , as he is the good example for explaining the conversation of leader is made or born.)
Admiration of Angela Merkel and Criticized of Merkel
Base on my personal perspectives on Angela Merkel , the purposed of admiration on Merkel
such as:
1.Democratic Leadership
2. Utilization on Talents
3. specify and explicit decision making
4. Strong and Influences women
5. Play a large role in Germany and Europe Financial or economic
6. A good motivation for European leaders example even world
7. Demonstrated and Certify a good aspect of human resources program ( recruitment & selection, leadership , organization structure , Motivation and Corporate Culture.
8. Justice Distinguished on any statement or decision she revealed
9. Respect from her people ( the main point for admire her)
10. Responsibility
11. Operating Germany to dominance role of economics in Europe
12. Fight for prejudice and given a fair play to Jewish community in Germany
and even more things she done for getting admiration from people , she had done what actually met the specifications of world class leaders. I had nothing to criticize on her action , cause I could not find any fault from her action since she was the chancellor of Germany. Therefore a good & strong women leaders have worthy as Angela Merkel no matter in any aspect of ethics, social , environment or other social factor that she still demonstrated a good performance , sample and contribution , a good leader sample to followed.
0 comments:
Post a Comment